Product Code Database
The woolly rhinoceros ( Coelodonta antiquitatis) is an extinct species of rhinoceros that inhabited northern Eurasia during the Pleistocene epoch. The woolly rhinoceros was large, comparable in size to the largest living rhinoceros species, the white rhinoceros ( Ceratotherium simum), and covered with long, thick hair that allowed it to survive in the extremely cold, harsh mammoth steppe. It had a massive hump reaching from its shoulder and fed mainly by grazing on that grew in the steppe. Mummified carcasses preserved in permafrost and many bone remains of woolly rhinoceroses have been found. Images of woolly rhinoceroses are found among in Europe and Asia, and evidence has been found suggesting that the species was hunted by humans. Like other Pleistocene megafauna, the species became extinct as part of the end-Pleistocene extinction event. The range of the woolly rhinoceros contracted towards Siberia beginning around 17,000 years ago, with the youngest reliable records being around 14,000 years old in northeast Siberia, coinciding with the Bølling–Allerød warming, which likely disrupted its habitat, with environmental DNA records possibly extending the range of the species around 9,800 years ago. Its closest living relative is the Sumatran rhinoceros ( Dicerorhinus sumatrensis).
One of the earliest scientific descriptions of an ancient rhinoceros species was made in 1769, when the naturalist Peter Simon Pallas wrote a report on his expeditions to Siberia where he found a skull and two horns in the permafrost. In 1772, Pallas acquired a head and two legs of a rhinoceros from the locals in Irkutsk, and named the species Rhinoceros lenenesis (after the Lena River). In 1799, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach studied rhinoceros bones from the collection of the University of Göttingen, and proposed the scientific name Rhinoceros antiquitatis.Gehler, Alexander & Reich, Mike & Mol, Dick & Plicht, Hans. (2007). The type material of Coelodonta antiquitatis (Blumenbach) (Mammalia: Perissodactyla: Rhinocerotidae) / Типовой материал Coelodonta antiquitatis (Blumenbach) (Mammalia: Perissodactyla: Rhinocerotidae) / Tipovoj material Coelodonta antiquitatis (Blumenbach) (Mammalia: Perissodactyla: Rhinocerotidae). The geologist Heinrich Georg Bronn moved the species to Coelodonta in 1831 because of its differences in dental formation with members of the Rhinoceros genus. This name comes from the Ancient Greek words κοιλος ( koilos, "hollow") and ὀδούς ( odoús "tooth"), from the depression in the rhino's molar structure, giving the scientific name Coelodonta antiquitatis, "hollow-tooth of antiquity".
Relationships of the woolly rhinoceros based on morphology, excluding African rhinoceros species:The ancestors of Coelodonta are suggested to have diverged from those of the Sumatran rhinoceros around 9.4 million years ago, with Coelodonta diverging from Stephanorhinus around 5.5 million years ago. The oldest known species of Coelodonta, Coelodonta thibetana is known from the Pliocene of Tibet dating to approximately 3.7 million years ago, with the genus being present in Siberia, Mongolia, and China during the Early Pleistocene. The woolly rhinoceros first appeared during the early Middle Pleistocene in China, and the oldest remains of the species in Europe, which represents the only species of Coelodonta to have been present in the region, date to approximately 450,000 years ago. The woolly rhinoceros is divided into two Chronospecies-subspecies, with C. a. praecursor from the middle Pleistocene and C. a. antiquitatis from the late Pleistocene. Mitochondrial genomes suggest that the last mitochondrial ancestor of Late Pleistocene woolly rhinoceroses lived around 570,000 years ago.
Like the living white rhinoceros, the shoulder was at least sometimes raised with a substantial hump, which may have developed to support the weight of the animals large head and horns. Unlike the hump of the white rhinoceros, the hump of the woolly rhinoceros contained substantial fat reserves (probably predominantly white fat), the most substantial on the entire body. The hump likely served for thermoregulation (reducing the surface-area-to-volume ratio to make keeping the body warm more efficient) and/or as a storage for energy gained during warmer months to use during cold months. Aside from depictions in cave paintings, a hump is only definitively known from a single mummified subadult specimen (around 4-4.5 years old), and it is possible that the hump was a juvenile only feature or that the size/presence of the hump varied seasonally.
Both males and females had two horns which were made of keratin, with one long nasal horn at the front of the skull reaching forward and a smaller posterior frontal horn between the eyes. The nasal horn would have typically measured long for individuals at 25 to 35 years of age, while the frontal horn would have measured up to long, with the mass of measured woolly rhinoceros nasal horns varing from , with an average mass of . The longest nasal horn ever recorded is long measured along the curvature. Unlike in modern rhinos, the large nasal horn was often flattened in cross-section, and abrasion patterns on the horn indicate its possible use in brushing away snow when grazing.
The nasal septum of the woolly rhinoceros was ossification, unlike modern rhinos. This was most common in adult males. This adaptation probably evolved as a result of the heavy pressure on the horn and face when the rhinoceros grazed underneath the thick snow. Unique to this rhino, the nasal bones were fused to the , which is not the case in older Coelodonta types or today's rhinoceroses. This ossification inspired the junior synonym specific name tichorhinus, from Greek τειχος (teikhos) "wall", ῥις (ῥιν-) (rhis (rhin-)) "nose".
The woolly rhinoceros had several features which reduced the body's surface area and minimized heat loss. Its ears were no longer than , while those of rhinos in hot climates are about . Their tails were also relatively shorter. It also had thick skin, ranging from , heaviest on the chest and shoulders. Beneath the skin, the body was covered in a layer of subcutaneous fat, ranging from thick on the chest, to on the lower jaw and the posterior part of the back.
With their massive horns and size, adults had few predators, but young individuals could have been killed and consumed by predators such as and Panthera spelaea. A skull from the Volga region of Russia was found with trauma suggested to have been inflicted by a cave lion when it was a juvenile, but the animal survived to adulthood. Remains of woolly rhinoceros are frequently found in cave hyena dens with gnaw marks indicating that their remains were consumed by them,Diedrich, C.G. & ŽÁK, K. 2006. Prey deposits and den sites of the Upper Pleistocene hyena Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss, 1823) in horizontal and vertical caves of the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic). Bulletin of Geosciences 81(4), 237–276 (25 figures). Czech Geological Survey, Prague. ISSN 1214-1119. which to a large degree likely reflects scavenging of the carcasses of already dead rhinoceroses. A piece of juvenile woolly rhinoceros skin with blond fur (possibly representing that of a calf) was recovered from the stomach content of two frozen juvenile female Pleistocene wolves, which was inferred to be part of the wolves' last meal.
Woolly rhinos may have used their horns for combat, probably including intraspecific combat as recorded in cave paintings, as well as for moving snow to uncover vegetation during winter. They may have also been used to attract mates. Bull woolly rhinos were probably territorial like their modern counterparts, defending themselves from competitors, particularly during the rutting season. Fossil skulls indicate damage from the front horns of other rhinos, and lower jaws and back ribs show signs of being broken and re-formed, which may have also come from fighting. The apparent frequency of intraspecific combat, compared to recent rhinos, was likely a result of rapid climatic change during the last glacial period, when the animal faced increased stress from competition with other large herbivores.
C. antiquitatis individuals of old age display extensive wear and loss of their anterior premolars as a result of tooth abrasion from their intensive grazing lifestyle.
By the end of the Riss glaciation about 130,000 years ago, the woolly rhinoceros lived throughout northern Eurasia, spanning most of Europe, the Russian Plain, Siberia, and the Mongolian Plateau, ranging to extremes of 72° to 33°N. Fossils have been found as far north as the New Siberian Islands.Garutt, N. V., & Boeskorov, G. G. (2001). Woolly rhinoceroses: On the history of the genus. Mamont i ego okruzhenie, 200, 157-167. Even during the very warm Eemian interglacial, the range of the woolly rhinoceros extended into temperate regions such as Poland. It had the widest range of any rhinoceros species.Prothero, D.R., Guérin, C. & Manning, E. 1989. The History of Rhinocerotoidea. In: The Evolution of Perissodactyls (eds. Prothero, D. R. & Schoch, R.M.). Oxford University Press, New York, 321-340.
It seemingly did not cross the Bering land bridge during the last ice age (which connected Asia to North America), with its easterly-most occurrence at the Chukotka Peninsula, probably due to the low grass density and lack of suitable habitat in the Yukon combined with competition from other large herbivores on the frigid land bridge.
Woolly rhinoceroses shared their habitat with modern humans, but direct evidence that they interacted is relatively rare. Only 11% of the known sites of prehistoric Siberian tribes have remains or images of the animal. Many rhinoceros remains are found in caves (such as the Kůlna Cave in Central Europe), which were not the natural habitat of either rhinos or humans, and large predators such as hyenas may have carried rhinoceros parts there. Sometimes, only individual teeth or bone fragments are uncovered, which usually came from only one animal.Bratlund, B. (2005). Comments on a cut-marked woolly rhino mandible from Zwolen. In: R. Schild (ed.), The killing fields of Zwolén. A Middle Paleolithic kill-butchery-site in Central Poland. Warsaw, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences: 217-221. Most rhinoceros remains in Western Europe are found in the same places where human remains or artifacts were found, but this may have occurred naturally.
Signs that early humans hunted or scavenged the rhinoceros come from markings on the animal's bones. One specimen had injuries caused by human weaponry, with traces of a wound from a sharp object marking the shoulder and thigh, and a preserved spear was found near the carcass. A few sites from the early phase of the Last Glacial Period in the late Middle Paleolithic, such as the Gudenus Cave (Austria) and the open air site of Königsaue (Saxony-Anhalt, Germany), have heavily beaten rhinoceros bones lined with slash marks. This action was done partly to extract the nutritious bone marrow.
Both horns and bones of the rhinoceros were used as raw materials for tools and weapons, as were remains from other animals.Gaudzinski, S. 1999a. The faunal record of the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic of Europe: remarks on human interference. In The Middle Palaeolithic Occupation of Europe. (ed. W. Roebroeks and C. Gamble) Leiden: University of Leiden, pp. 215 - 233. In what is now Zwoleń, Poland, a device was made from a battered woolly rhinoceros pelvis.
About 20 Paleolithic drawings of woolly rhinos were known before the discovery of the Chauvet Cave in France. They are dated at over 31,000 years old, probably from the Aurignacian, engraving on cave walls or drawn in red or black. One scene depicts two rhinos fighting each other with their horns. Other illustrations are found in the Rouffignac Cave and Lascaux caves. One drawing from Font-de-Gaume shows a noticeably higher head posture, and others were drawn in red pigments in the Kapova Cave in the Ural Mountains. Some images show rhinoceroses struck with spears or arrows, signifying human hunting.
The site of Dolní Věstonice in Moravia, Czech Republic, was found with more than seven hundred of animals, many of woolly rhinoceroses.
The Pinhole Cave Man is a late Paleolithic figure of a man engraved on a rib bone of a woolly rhinoceros, found at Creswell Crags in England.
A genetic study of the woolly rhinoceros remains in northeast Siberia, dating to around 18,500 years ago, a few thousand years before its extinction, found that the population size was stable and relatively large, despite long-term co-existence with humans in the region. A specimen of 14,400-year old woolly rhinoceros muscle tissue found preserved in a permafrost-frozen juvenile wolf's stomach in the Tumat region of far north-northeastern Siberia, which represents among the youngest specimens of the species, had a similar level of genetic diversity to the 18,500-year old specimen, implying that the woolly rhinoceros population in the region was stable up until a likely rapid decline during the Bølling–Allerød warming. A Holocene survival of the species has been suggested by the finding of environmental DNA of the woolly rhinoceros in sediments of the Kolyma region of Northeast Siberia dating to 9,800 ± 200 years ago. However, it has been demonstrated that ancient DNA in permafrost can be reworked into sediment layers dating to well after the extinction of the originating species, though other authors have argued that this specific environmental DNA record is unlikely to have been reworked. Low level human hunting (~10% of every woolly rhinoceros generation) may have played a decisive role in the extinction by reducing the ability of woolly rhinoceros populations to colonise newly suitable habitat, thereby exacerbating the population fragmentation brought on by environmental change.
The extinction of the woolly rhinoceros formed part of the broader end-Pleistocene extinction event spanning from the latter Late Pleistocene to the beginning of the Holocene, where most terrestrial megafauna (large animals) became extinct, including 80% of those over 1 tonne. As with the woolly rhinoceros, humans and climatic factors are thought to have been the primary cause of the extinctions.
In October 1907, miners in Starunia, Russian Empire, found a mammoth carcass buried in an ozokerite pit. A month later, a rhinoceros was found underneath. Both were sent to the Dzieduszycki Museum, where a detailed description was published in the museum's monograph.Bayger, J.A., Hoyer, H., Kiernik, E., Kulczyński, W., Łomnicki, M., Łomnicki J., Mierzejewski, W., Niezabitowski, E., Raciborski, W., Szafer, W. & Schille, F., 1914. Wykopaliska staruńskie. Słoń mamut (Elephas primigenius Blum.) i nosorożec włochaty (Rhinoceros antiquitatis Blum. s. tichorhinus Fisch.) wraz z współczesną florą i fauną. Muzeum im. Dzieduszyckich we Lwowie, 15, 386 pp + atlas (67 tab.). (In Polish). Photographs were published in paleontological journals and textbooks, and the first modern paintings of the species were based on the mounted specimen. The rhino is now located in the Lviv National Museum along with the mammoth. Later, in 1929, the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences sent an expedition to Starunia, finding the mummified remains of three rhinos. One specimen, missing only its horns and fur, was taken to the Aquarium and Natural History Museum in Kraków. A plaster cast was made soon afterwards, which is now held in the Natural History Museum in London.Nowak, J., Panow, E., Tokarski, J., Szafer, W. & Stach, J. 1930. The second woolly rhinoceros ( Coelodonta antiquitatis Blum.) from Starunia, Poland (Geology, Mineralogy, Flora and Fauna). Classe des Sciences Mathématiques et Naturelles, Série B: Sciences Naturelles, Supplément 1-47.
Skull and rib fragments of a rhinoceros were found in 1972 in Churapcha, between the Lena River and Amga River rivers. A whole skeleton was found soon afterwards, with preserved skin, fur, and stomach contents.Lazarev, P.A., Boeskorov, G.G., Tomskaya, A.I., Garutt, N.V., Vasil'ev, E.M., and Kasparov, A.K., Mlekopitayushchie antropogena Yakutii (Mammals of the Anthropogene in Yakutia), Yakutsk: Yakut. Nauch. Tsentr Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1998. In 1976, schoolchildren on a class trip found a 20,000-year-old rhinoceros skeleton on the Aldan River's left bank, uncovering a skull with both horns, a spine, ribs and limb bones.
In 2007, a partial rhinoceros carcass was found in the lower reaches of the Kolyma river. Its upward-facing position indicates that the animal probably fell into mud and sank. Next year in 2008, a nearly complete skeleton came from the Chukochya River. That same year, locals near the Amga discovered mummified rhinoceros remains, and over the next two years, , tail vertebrae and ribs were excavated along with forelimbs and hind limbs with toes intact.Lazarev, P.A., Grigoriev, S.E., Plotnikov, V.V., 2010. Woolly rhinoceroses from Yakutia//evolution of life on the Earth. In: Proceedings of the IV International
Symposium. TML-Press, Tomsk, pp. 555e558.
In September 2014, a mummified young rhinoceros was discovered by two hunters, Alexander "Sasha" Banderov and Simeon Ivanov, at a tributary of the Semyulyakh River in the Abyysky District in Sakha Republic, Russia. Its head and horns, fur, and soft tissues were recovered. Some parts had been thawed and eaten since they were not covered by permafrost. The body was handed over to the Yakutia Academy of Sciences, where it was named "Sasha" after one of its discoverers. Dental analysis shows that the calf was about seven months old at the time of its death. With its well-intact preservation, scientists proceeded to undergo DNA analysis.
In August 2020, a rhinoceros was found, after being revealed by melting permafrost, close to the site of the 2014 discovery. The rhino was between three and four years old and it is thought that the cause of death was drowning. It is one of the best-preserved animals recovered from the region, having most of its internal organs intact. The discovery was also notable for the preservation of a small nasal horn, a rarity as these normally decompose quickly.
Evolution
The woolly rhinoceros was the most recent species of the genus Coelodonta. The closest living relative of Coelodonta is the Sumatran rhinoceros, and the genus is also closely related to the extinct genus Stephanorhinus. A cladogram showing the relationships of C. antiquitatis to other Late Pleistocene-recent rhinoceros species based on genomic data is given below.
Description
Size and general morphology
An adult woolly rhinoceros typically measured from head to tail, stood tall at the shoulder, and weighed up to (with some sources estimate the species' maximum shoulder height at and its weight at ) making it comparable in size to the largest living rhinoceros species, the white rhinoceros ( Ceratotherium simum). Compared to other rhinoceroses, the woolly rhinoceros had a longer head and body, and shorter legs.
Skull and dentition
The skull had a length between . It was longer than those of other rhinoceros, giving the head a deep, downward-facing slanting position, similar to its fossil relative Stephanorhinus hemitoechus and Elasmotherium as well as the white rhinoceros. Strong muscles on its long occipital bone formed its neck hock and held the massive skull. Its massive lower jaw measured up to long and high. The teeth of the woolly rhinoceros had thickened enamel and an open internal cavity. Like other rhinos, adults did not have . It had 3 and 3 molars in both jaws. The molars were high-crowned and had a thick coat of cementum.
External appearance
Frozen specimens indicate that the woolly rhino's long fur coat was brown in adults and light brown in juveniles, with a thick undercoat that lay under a layer of long, coarse guard hair thickest on the withers and neck. Shorter hair covered the limbs, keeping snow from attaching. The body's length ended with a tail with a brush of coarse hair at the end.Kalandadze N.N., Shapovalov A.V. & Tesakova E.M.— On nomenclatural problems concerning woolly rhinoceros Coelodonta antiquitatis (Blumenbach, 1799) // Researches on paleontology and biostratigraphy of ancient continental deposits (Memories of Professor Vitalii G. Ochev). Eds. M.A. Shishkin & V.P. Tverdokhlebov.— Saratov: «Nauchnaya Kniga» Publishers, 2009. P. 98–111. Females had two nipples on the .
Paleobiology and palaeoecology
The woolly rhinoceros had a similar life history to modern rhinos. Studies on milk teeth show that individuals developed similarly to both the white and black rhinoceros. The two teats in the female suggest that she raised one calf, or more rarely two, every two to three years.
Diet
Woolly rhinoceroses mostly fed on grasses and cyperaceae that grew in the mammoth steppe. Its long, slanted head with a downward-facing posture, and tooth structure all helped it graze on vegetation. It had a wide upper lip like that of the white rhinoceros, which allowed it to easily pluck vegetation directly from the ground. A strain vector biomechanics investigation of the skull, mandible and tooth of a well-preserved last cold stage individual recovered from Whitemoor Haye, Staffordshire, revealed muscle and dental characteristics that support a grazing feeding preference. In particular, the enlargement of the temporalis and neck muscles is consistent with that required to resist the large tugging forces generated when taking large mouthfuls of fodder from the ground. The presence of a large dentistry supports this theory. Comparisons with living confirm that the woolly rhinoceros was a hindgut fermentor with a single stomach, consuming cellulose-rich, protein-poor fodder. It had to consume a heavy amount of food to account for the low nutritive content of its diet. Woolly rhinos living in the Arctic during the Last Glacial Maximum consumed approximately equal volumes of , such as Artemisia, and . Pollen analysis shows it also ate woody plants (including , and ), along with flowers, and . Isotope studies on horns show that the woolly rhinoceros had a seasonal diet; different areas of horn growth suggest that it mainly grazed in summer, while it browsed for shrubs and branches in the winter.Tiunov, Alexei & Kirillova, Irina. (2010). Stable isotope (C-13/C-12 and N-15/N-14) composition of the woolly rhinoceros Coelodonta antiquitatis horn suggests seasonal changes in the diet. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM. 24. 3146-50. 10.1002/rcm.4755. Mesowear measurements further show that the woolly rhinoceros's diet was heavily composed on abrasive grasses.
Growth and pathologies
An adult female discovered in Yakutia suggests that it could have had a lifespan of about 40 years or more, similar to that of its modern relatives. The adult male fossil found in Altai (specimen AMBU n349) lived to be over 35 years old. In 2014, Shpansky analysed the growth of woolly rhinoceros from its early life stages based on several lower jaw fragments and limb bones. A one-month-old calf was about in length and tall at the shoulder. The most intensive growth in woolly rhinos occurred during the juvenile stage around 3 to 4 years of age with a shoulder height of . At 7 to 10 years of age, woolly rhinos became young adults with a shoulder height of . By more than 14 years of age, woolly rhinos became fully mature, old adults with a shoulder height of .
Habitat and distribution
The woolly rhinoceros lived mainly in , and river valleys, with dry to arid climates, and migrated to higher elevations in favourable climate phases. It avoided mountain ranges, due to heavy snow and steep terrain that the animal could not easily cross. The rhino's main habitat was the mammoth steppe, a large, open landscape covered with wide ranges of grass and bushes. The woolly rhinoceros lived alongside other large herbivores, such as the woolly mammoth, Irish elk, reindeer, saiga antelope and European bison – an assortment of animals known as the Mammuthus- Coelodonta Faunal Complex. With its wide distribution, the woolly rhinoceros lived in some areas alongside the other rhinoceroses Stephanorhinus and Elasmotherium.
Relationship with humans
Hunting
Paired δ13C and δ15N measurements of fossils from Les Pradelles indicate that woolly rhinoceroses made up a significant proportion of the diet of the local Neanderthal population.
R. Schild (2026). 9788389499233, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences. ISBN 9788389499233 Half-meter spear throwers, made from a woolly rhinoceros horn about 27,000 years ago, came from the Yana Rhinoceros Horn Site on the banks of the Yana River. A 13,300-year-old spear found on Bolshoy Lyakhovsky Island has a tip made of rhinoceros horn, the furthest north a human artifact has ever been found.
Ancient art
Many cave paintings from the Upper Paleolithic depict woolly rhinoceroses. The animal's defining features are prominently drawn, complete with the raised back and hump, contrasting with its low-lying head. Two curved lines represent the ears. The animal's horns are drawn with their long curvature, and in some cases, the coat is also indicated. Many paintings show a black band dividing the body. (1997). 9780520229006, University of California Press. ISBN 9780520229006
Extinction
Analysis of the nuclear genome suggests that the woolly rhinoceros experienced a population expansion beginning around 30,000 years ago. The end of the last glacial period shows a progressive contraction of the range of the woolly rhinoceros, with the species disappearing from Europe during the interval between 17 and 15,000 years ago, with its youngest confirmed reliable records obtained from bones being from the Ural Mountains, dating to 14,200 years ago, and northeast Siberia, dating to around 14,000 years ago. The youngest records of the species coincide with the onset of the Bølling–Allerød warming (which began around 14,700 years ago), which likely resulted in increased precipitation (including snowfall), which transformed the woolly rhinoceros' preferred low-growing grass and herb habitat into one dominated by shrubs and trees. Apparent later radiocarbon dates obtained from other fossils have been considered questionable.(see supplementary material) The woolly rhinoceros was likely intolerant of deep snow, which its short limbs were inefficient in moving through. Population fragmentation is likely to have played a role in its extinction. The presence of large numbers of abnormal in specimens from the North Sea, much higher than that found in living rhinoceroses, may have been the result of inbreeding due to low population size or harsh environmental conditions.
Frozen specimens
Many rhinoceros remains have been found preserved in the permafrost region. In 1771, a head, two legs and hide were found in the Vilyuy River in eastern Siberia and sent to the Kunstkamera in Saint Petersburg. Later in 1877, a Siberian trader recovered a head and one leg from a tributary of the Yana River.
See also
External links
|
|
